An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy, 548 U.S. 291 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case about experts' fees in cases commenced under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, ruled that IDEA does not authorize the payment of the experts' fees of the prevailing parents. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg concurred in part, and in the judgment. Justices David Souter and Stephen Breyer filed dissents.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy, 548 U.S. 291 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case about experts' fees in cases commenced under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, ruled that IDEA does not authorize the payment of the experts' fees of the prevailing parents. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg concurred in part, and in the judgment. Justices David Souter and Stephen Breyer filed dissents. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 8217742 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 8565 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1107896000 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-04-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2006 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Ginsburg (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2006 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Souter (en)
  • Breyer (en)
dbp:docket
  • 5 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Pearl Murphy, et vir (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:italicTitle
  • force (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Stevens, Souter (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy (en)
dbp:majority
  • Alito (en)
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 25920.0
dbp:uspage
  • 291 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 548 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy, 548 U.S. 291 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case about experts' fees in cases commenced under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, ruled that IDEA does not authorize the payment of the experts' fees of the prevailing parents. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg concurred in part, and in the judgment. Justices David Souter and Stephen Breyer filed dissents. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Pearl Murphy,et vir (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License