About: Princo Corp. v. ITC

An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Princo Corp. v. ITC, 616 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2010) was a 2010 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, that sought to narrow the defense of patent misuse to claims for patent infringement. Princo held that a party asserting the defense of patent misuse, absent a case of so-called per se misuse, must prove both "leveraging" of the patent being enforced against it and a substantial anticompetitive effect outside the legitimate scope of that patent right. In so ruling, the court emphasized that the misuse alleged must involve the patent in suit, not another patent.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Princo Corp. v. ITC, 616 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2010) was a 2010 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, that sought to narrow the defense of patent misuse to claims for patent infringement. Princo held that a party asserting the defense of patent misuse, absent a case of so-called per se misuse, must prove both "leveraging" of the patent being enforced against it and a substantial anticompetitive effect outside the legitimate scope of that patent right. In so ruling, the court emphasized that the misuse alleged must involve the patent in suit, not another patent. The majority opinion substantially "entangle[d] patent misuse jurisprudence with antitrust concepts." The Supreme Court's subsequent opinion in Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC, however, points strongly in the opposite direction, rejecting the conflation of misuse and antitrust and insisting that they embody different policies. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 47987592 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 37724 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1044810135 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:case
  • 25920.0
dbp:citations
  • 17280.0
dbp:concurrence
  • Prost (en)
dbp:court
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-08-30 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2010 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Dyk (en)
dbp:fullname
  • Princo Corp. v. International Trade Commission (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence
  • Mayer (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Gajarsa (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Rader, Newman, Lourie, Linn, Moore (en)
dbp:judges
dbp:lawsapplied
  • Tariff Act of 1930, (en)
dbp:litigants
  • Princo Corp. v. ITC (en)
dbp:majority
  • Bryson (en)
dbp:otherSource
  • Google Scholar (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdfs:comment
  • Princo Corp. v. ITC, 616 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2010) was a 2010 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, that sought to narrow the defense of patent misuse to claims for patent infringement. Princo held that a party asserting the defense of patent misuse, absent a case of so-called per se misuse, must prove both "leveraging" of the patent being enforced against it and a substantial anticompetitive effect outside the legitimate scope of that patent right. In so ruling, the court emphasized that the misuse alleged must involve the patent in suit, not another patent. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Princo Corp. v. ITC (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License