Property talk:P1709

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

equivalent class
equivalent class in other ontologies (use property URI)
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1709#Scope, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Item “subclass of (P279): Items with this property should also have “subclass of (P279)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1709#Item P279, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1709#Entity types
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1709#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)

Constraint violations

[edit]

Wikidata:Database reports/Constraint violations/P1709

This property has 377 constraint violations i.e. items that doesn't use it as qualifier. We should think about the concept.--Bigbossfarin (talk) 20:49, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that all the violations are gone. Peter F. Patel-Schneider (talk) 23:14, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

not equivalent to exact match

[edit]

This property is for classes only whereas skos exact match is for anything. Thus they cannot be equivalent. I've deprecated the claim. Peter F. Patel-Schneider (talk) 23:11, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter F. Patel-Schneider: Is this a subproperty of exact match?--Malore (talk) 02:14, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to me that it is. Accordingly, I've added the statement subproperty of (P1647)exact match (P2888). Silver hr (talk) 13:47, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]