Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support fact-checking work around media objects (via MediaReview and associated terms). #2450

Open
danbri opened this issue Jan 30, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

Support fact-checking work around media objects (via MediaReview and associated terms). #2450

danbri opened this issue Jan 30, 2020 · 6 comments
Assignees
@danbri
Labels
no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!).

Comments

@danbri
Copy link
Contributor

danbri commented Jan 30, 2020

See proposal circulated, Monday, 6 January 2020 "fact-checking images and videos: a proposal Dan Brickley":

discussions with fact checkers and others, towards improved documentation, vocabulary and
markup patterns for fact checking videos and images.

There's a draft at the link below from Bill and Joel Luther, which builds
on prior work by the Washington Post. Comments are probably best made
directly in the document (SEOs, please *don't* ask SEO questions there!). The
document includes links to the earlier work mentioned, and to a spreadsheet that
tries to apply the proposal to some real world examples. Please take a look.

Details at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jRbX2IesVQrWvKpehb8ntSMKe0D88bZp3nK8ZAjq6E4/edit
@danbri danbri self-assigned this Jan 30, 2020
danbri added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 30, 2020
@danbri
Drafting implementation of MediaReview for discussion. /cc #2450
f0cf826
danbri added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 30, 2020
@danbri
Added disclaimer. /cc #2450
a6a3a03
@danbri danbri mentioned this issue Jan 31, 2020
Closed
4 tasks
danbri added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2020
@danbri @Dataliberate
move V6 patch and medical, usageinfo drafts into master (#2456)
fde3730 
* Reinstated 301 redirect to https

* Fixed typo: Recommendation not Recommended.

* Add in tweaks to OPTIONS request response headers

* Drafting implementation of MediaReview for discussion. /cc #2450

* Updated mediaAuthenticityCategory label.

* Added disclaimer. /cc #2450

* updated so that label matches id.

* usageInfo and acquireLicensePage properties #2454

Co-authored-by: Richard Wallis <rjw@dataliberate.com>
@danbri danbri closed this as completed in c9c7554 Apr 14, 2020
@danbri
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbri commented May 28, 2020

It appears I accidentally closed this issue last month; my apologies, I got an issue number wrong and referenced it by mistake.

@danbri danbri reopened this Jul 22, 2020
@danbri
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbri commented Jul 22, 2020

See also https://www.niemanlab.org/2020/01/is-this-video-missing-context-transformed-or-edited-this-effort-wants-to-standardize-how-we-categorize-visual-misinformation/ for background.

As of July 2020, we have a placeholder stub in Schema.org (marked as "pending") but more work is needed both on the code list, on ensuring we understand how it relates to ClaimReview markup patterns, the relative scope of ClaimReview vs MediaReview, and the wider impact on the ecosystem that such a markup might have.

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue is being tagged as Stale due to inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!). label Sep 21, 2020
@danbri danbri mentioned this issue Feb 18, 2021
Open
danbri added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2021
@danbri
Bringing implementation files up to date with discussion from #2450
f7fdf67
danbri added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2021
@danbri
Added mediaItemAppearance #2450
9259243
danbri added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2021
@danbri
Updated example to use mediaItemAppearance #2450
928fd9f
danbri added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2021
@danbri
Added :associatedReview, :associatedClaimReview and :associatedMediaR…
76758c8 
…eview

following discussion with Duke team on relating ClaimReview and MediaReview.
Also added a missing word ('parody') - thanks @joelwluther for catching that!

For #2450
danbri added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2021
@danbri
Updated embeddedTextCaption to match domain with :caption property.
78f23d4 
For #2450
@lagsh
Copy link

lagsh commented Jun 15, 2022

maybe this could also be provided in other contexts like for an event to show if there were any changes?

@chrisspradling1980
Copy link

chrisspradling1980 commented Jun 15, 2022 via email

@danbri
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbri commented Aug 16, 2022

Nearby: #3162

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@danbri danbri

Labels
no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!).
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@danbri @chrisspradling1980 @lagsh and others