This will push the reps application and onboarding process to be more strict, but you also suggest that this process should be made quicker.
I checked the reps application and onboarding process, and it looks solid on paper, yet there are doubts about credibiliity of some reps.
Suggestions:
- Make reps application transparent.
It reduces some burden from screening.
- Make application feedback open to the public.
Helps other applicants also.
- Archive these and make it accessible for future reference.
I am not blaming the people who are evaluating these applications, they’re doing a good job. Some arguments in this thread may indicate that the application evaluation may be flawed and my suggestions aim to prevent such ambiguity in the future.