This is good. I’ve seen these already. The problem is that when weeding out reps like this, the list is made with reps who don’t have activity in the last 12 months. So, one activity will keep a rep “active” for 12 months. And 2 will keep them for 24 months.

I’ve seen that wiki page and most of the wiki pages. I’m not criticizing reps program without knowing anything about the reps program. I don’t have time to do “statistics research” on showing that the council has some leaders who have been there for more than 3 or 4 or more councils. This may be okay according to the reps rules, but think about how that maybe affecting the reps program.

I’ve seen this list too. What this list doesn’t say (besides being paginated in an unnavigable format), is which rep had to be pushed out and which rep voluntarily stepped down. It is this ratio that will tell you how much insight reps have into their role and duties.