This will push the reps application and onboarding process to be more strict, but you also suggest that this process should be made quicker.

I checked the reps application and onboarding process, and it looks solid on paper, yet there are doubts about credibiliity of some reps.

Suggestions:

1. Make reps application transparent.
   It reduces some burden from screening.
2. Make application feedback open to the public.
   Helps other applicants also.
3. Archive these and make it accessible for future reference.

I am not blaming the people who are evaluating these applications, they’re doing a good job. Some arguments in this thread may indicate that the application evaluation may be flawed and my suggestions aim to prevent such ambiguity in the future.