Not logged in : Login

About: http://ods-qa.openlinksw.com:8896/proxy-iri/bc9002289abb7bac85be1e3b223d0716ec0fc504     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:DiscussionForumPosting, within Data Space : ods-qa.openlinksw.com:8896 associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
type
datePublished
publisher
interactionStatistic
interactionType
userInteractionCount
  • 0
described by
mainEntityOfPage
author
position
  • #4
  • #5
dateModified
articleBody
  • @lucyeoh It did not start out like this but the project I wish to hand over to Mozilla I think would now be described as a web-based scheme for individuals in different industries to create apps. As information is so complex and diverse, these individuals need a standard machine-like interface to assemble what aspects of what needs analysing to achieve specific outcomes. For example, to find the best deal for a hotel booking, location, star rating, room type, price, availability and view are current options, but to arrive at a design for creating the same guestroom was far more complex, not only involving the same aspects but also building product selection, physical relationships, regulations, budgets, timing and other design criteria. As much of mainstream work involves setting or retrieving values of selected aspects, the names of the aspects provide the key to finding appropriate open source code modules to manage values and optionally generate related multimedia. In simple terms it is about a new type of machine, a new way to document mainstream work and opening up significantly more new areas of human activity for the IT sector to automate. (screen shots and video ). It seemed to me that when considering something like this, a bureaucracy first needs some research into its credibility before committing resources to really get it going. I am sure this was true before the introduction of eBanking, personal computing or WWW itself. As the project is about both open source information and code I think assessment really should be from more than one perspective, so I set up the GitHub issue with the idea of being grilled by a working party. I am happy to change tack; please advise.
  • Hey @chrisglasier, I’ve looked through your GitHub issue and unfortunately I’m really struggling to understand what the project you want to do, or would like Mozilla to do is. It sounds like you’d like Mozilla to do “the same kind of initial research banks required prior to considering the introduction of eBanking.” Is this something that you want Mozilla to implement? If so, in what capacity? It seems like you’ve put a lot of thought into this so I’d love to understand more. Thanks! Lucy
headline
  • Time limit for GitHub issues
is interactionStatistic of
is topic of
is container of of
is object of
is subject of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git55 as of Mar 01 2021


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:       RDF       ODATA       Microdata      About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3322 as of Mar 14 2022, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc25), Single-Server Edition (7 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software