articleBody
| -
@lucyeoh It did not
start out like this but the project I wish to hand over to Mozilla
I think would now be described as a web-based scheme for
individuals in different industries to create apps.
As information is so complex and diverse, these individuals need
a standard machine-like interface to assemble what aspects of what
needs analysing to achieve specific outcomes. For example, to find
the best deal for a hotel booking, location, star rating, room
type, price, availability and view are current options, but to
arrive at a design for creating the same guestroom was far more
complex, not only involving the same aspects but also building
product selection, physical relationships, regulations, budgets,
timing and other design criteria.
As much of mainstream work involves setting or retrieving values
of selected aspects, the names of the aspects provide the key to
finding appropriate open source code modules to manage values and
optionally generate related multimedia.
In simple terms it is about a new type of machine, a new way to
document mainstream work and opening up significantly more new
areas of human activity for the IT sector to automate. (screen shots and video ).
It seemed to me that when considering something like this, a
bureaucracy first needs some research into its credibility before
committing resources to really get it going. I am sure this was
true before the introduction of eBanking, personal computing or WWW
itself. As the project is about both open source information and
code I think assessment really should be from more than one
perspective, so I set up the GitHub issue with the idea of being
grilled by a working party. I am happy to change tack; please
advise.
|