This HTML5 document contains 219 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n5http://ods-qa.openlinksw.com:8896/about/id/entity/https/discourse.mozilla.org/t/image-gallery-assessment/
n10https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/image-gallery-assessment/
pwdrhttp://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n112018-01-22T22:30:
n2http://ods-qa.openlinksw.com:8896/proxy-iri/
n7http://ods-qa.openlinksw.com:8896/about/id/https/discourse.mozilla.org/t/image-gallery-assessment/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
siochttp://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#
n3https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/image-gallery-assessment/24687#

Statements

Subject Item
n2:0732f13c6bd51cd2365bc878a6f83f616a6c1c12
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 172
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
I was hoping not to self mark really this would help me get a proper unbiased assessment grade. I’m sure you understand when your working on your own as I have been it’s easy to con yourself that your work meets the grade… I agree with you. However, unfortunately we haven’t got the resources to manually assess everyone’s entries. I wish we did. However I have to say on this occasion I feel as though I’m pretty close the only real difference is that I have used an array to hold all the photo path values. But to me this is better than making up the path in the loop because you don’t have to change the code to change the photo - just substitute or add to the array, I have set the loop using the array.length property anyway. I think the rest is the same looking at what is required in the marking guide. What do you think.* * Yeah, cool, that all sounds fine. I agree that the array is a better way of doing this. In a real app, you’d probably retrieve the photos and info via some kind of JSON structure via an XHR call, or similar.
rdf:predicate
schema:articleBody
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
rdf:type
schema:InteractionCounter schema:DiscussionForumPosting
schema:datePublished
2017-07-17T14:39:02Z 2017-07-17T15:05:03Z
schema:publisher
n2:a439a40f76abb0743be66578b73891a13f811734
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
sioc:container_of
n2:dabef28c15cabc10013b50c38615f40572779621
schema:mainEntityOfPage
n10:24687
schema:author
n2:783fa9562d6c390879a627701b663ad1accc2a3d n2:de2fd9f9d0620935f106dcf8188108d5b1a9d825
schema:position
#4 #3
schema:dateModified
n11:27Z n11:26Z
schema:articleBody
I was hoping not to self mark really this would help me get a proper unbiased assessment grade. I’m sure you understand when your working on your own as I have been it’s easy to con yourself that your work meets the grade… I agree with you. However, unfortunately we haven’t got the resources to manually assess everyone’s entries. I wish we did. However I have to say on this occasion I feel as though I’m pretty close the only real difference is that I have used an array to hold all the photo path values. But to me this is better than making up the path in the loop because you don’t have to change the code to change the photo - just substitute or add to the array, I have set the loop using the array.length property anyway. I think the rest is the same looking at what is required in the marking guide. What do you think.* * Yeah, cool, that all sounds fine. I agree that the array is a better way of doing this. In a real app, you’d probably retrieve the photos and info via some kind of JSON structure via an XHR call, or similar. Hi Chris firstly thanks for your reply. I was hoping not to self mark really this would help me get a proper unbiased assessment grade. I’m sure you understand when your working on your own as I have been it’s easy to con yourself that your work meets the grade… However I have to say on this occasion I feel as though I’m pretty close the only real difference is that I have used an array to hold all the photo path values. But to me this is better than making up the path in the loop because you don’t have to change the code to change the photo - just substitute or add to the array, I have set the loop using the array.length property anyway. I think the rest is the same looking at what is required in the marking guide. What do you think.* * I was hoping not to self mark really this would help me get a proper unbiased assessment grade. I’m sure you understand when your working on your own as I have been it’s easy to con yourself that your work meets the grade… I agree with you. However, unfortunately we haven’t got the resources to manually assess everyone’s entries. I wish we did. However I have to say on this occasion I feel as though I’m pretty close the only real difference is that I have used an array to hold all the photo path values. But to me this is better than making up the path in the loop because you don’t have to change the code to change the photo - just substitute or add to the array, I have set the loop using the array.length property anyway. I think the rest is the same looking at what is required in the marking guide. What do you think.* * Yeah, cool, that all sounds fine. I agree that the array is a better way of doing this. In a real app, you’d probably retrieve the photos and info via some kind of JSON structure via an XHR call, or similar.
schema:headline
"Image gallery" assessment
n3:interactionStatistic
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a n2:49353a77632fd9e52aecc215b5837e5d39453b50
n3:interactionType
http://schema.org/LikeAction http://schema.org/CommentAction
n3:userInteractionCount
0 2 1
Subject Item
n2:409ef8188cffbeff5d7f118363d50efb1c37deb1
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 144
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
n2:dabef28c15cabc10013b50c38615f40572779621
rdf:predicate
sioc:container_of
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:0ed3c121bebf49f2548ea750867cd546cd67eb5b
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 145
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
Hi Chris firstly thanks for your reply. I was hoping not to self mark really this would help me get a proper unbiased assessment grade. I’m sure you understand when your working on your own as I have been it’s easy to con yourself that your work meets the grade… However I have to say on this occasion I feel as though I’m pretty close the only real difference is that I have used an array to hold all the photo path values. But to me this is better than making up the path in the loop because you don’t have to change the code to change the photo - just substitute or add to the array, I have set the loop using the array.length property anyway. I think the rest is the same looking at what is required in the marking guide. What do you think.* *
rdf:predicate
schema:articleBody
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:8770467b39abeed776f9ad1760281b83bf533eb7
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 146
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
n2:783fa9562d6c390879a627701b663ad1accc2a3d
rdf:predicate
schema:author
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:1523862e2c993313a9361e2a5fa694eab3dae569
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 147
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
n11:26Z
rdf:predicate
schema:dateModified
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:bd32064e85ee9ff38de8ce87a7eeb44db5b6ffba
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 148
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
2017-07-17T14:39:02Z
rdf:predicate
schema:datePublished
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:66300462eedf2535b45ab04b9bd909b6aa6195f5
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 149 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 177 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 176
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
"Image gallery" assessment
rdf:predicate
schema:headline
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:40211f52c98c740a7213cc101787f1efd4d5327e
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 150
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
#3
rdf:predicate
schema:position
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:9788a819d62a7df90fff3aa754d0908782b3ade9
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 180 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 151 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 181
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
schema:DiscussionForumPosting
rdf:predicate
rdf:type
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:c025853f566d8fa34b0eff9834cd7ba0fab4f1e4
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 152 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 182 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 181
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
schema:InteractionCounter
rdf:predicate
rdf:type
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:778c4258088a6e25cdce9f58a39b643a6a01f69b
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 183 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 182 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 153
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
n2:49353a77632fd9e52aecc215b5837e5d39453b50
rdf:predicate
n3:interactionStatistic
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:6db487324e206f30e0dd2b2726ed3c6c86c185db
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 183 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 154 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 184
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
rdf:predicate
n3:interactionStatistic
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:85dacf5c6eb6eeb9b93b8372ceb682cb9fe7506d
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 185 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 184 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 155
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
http://schema.org/CommentAction
rdf:predicate
n3:interactionType
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:bd9e68301b1de0231984837024d7ce9d37a75bac
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 186 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 187 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 156
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
0
rdf:predicate
n3:userInteractionCount
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:aec1f45f756f1b578b8a03c02d7547254d17342f
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 157 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 188 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 187
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
1
rdf:predicate
n3:userInteractionCount
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:a88e91cc7fbec40d8d2e20ce13ae8b59fb97323b
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 188 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 158 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 189
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
2
rdf:predicate
n3:userInteractionCount
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:f335cd1e1779a1e99326d90518dacbed39107ed2
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 173
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
I was hoping not to self mark really this would help me get a proper unbiased assessment grade. I’m sure you understand when your working on your own as I have been it’s easy to con yourself that your work meets the grade… I agree with you. However, unfortunately we haven’t got the resources to manually assess everyone’s entries. I wish we did. However I have to say on this occasion I feel as though I’m pretty close the only real difference is that I have used an array to hold all the photo path values. But to me this is better than making up the path in the loop because you don’t have to change the code to change the photo - just substitute or add to the array, I have set the loop using the array.length property anyway. I think the rest is the same looking at what is required in the marking guide. What do you think.* * Yeah, cool, that all sounds fine. I agree that the array is a better way of doing this. In a real app, you’d probably retrieve the photos and info via some kind of JSON structure via an XHR call, or similar.
rdf:predicate
schema:articleBody
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:51a3bb79336c57cd83d9b836f8102ce34151efef
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 173 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 174
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
n2:de2fd9f9d0620935f106dcf8188108d5b1a9d825
rdf:predicate
schema:author
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:facf78a467e146690f47a53284177393577918ef
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 174 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 175
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
n11:27Z
rdf:predicate
schema:dateModified
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:cd8c01708cadc5e1783f6980425d3d42ff89e770
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 176 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 175
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
2017-07-17T15:05:03Z
rdf:predicate
schema:datePublished
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:98622289d3f29a5b542e82adf78eaceb93522d7c
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 178 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 177
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
n10:24687
rdf:predicate
schema:mainEntityOfPage
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:005a0f66c4187413a566c6420d7f1121cc7c3d9c
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 178 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 179
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
#4
rdf:predicate
schema:position
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:f789bb9922c7e9df2c542ff229c9221383f5be2b
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 180 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 179
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
n2:a439a40f76abb0743be66578b73891a13f811734
rdf:predicate
schema:publisher
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a
Subject Item
n2:921286a10d1cc9c759c238752edf35d4e6020f55
rdf:type
rdf:Statement
rdfs:label
Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 186 Embedded HTML5 Microdata Statement 185
pwdr:describedby
n5:24687 n7:24687
rdf:object
http://schema.org/LikeAction
rdf:predicate
n3:interactionType
rdf:subject
n2:8f522bccbcfce596fbee8b2897bd0465f1742e5a